I proposed a "requireSig" field in d/ a while back. This would enable trust-free website mirroring, and would allow a static website to be guaranteed safe even if the public server were completely compromised. I'm not sure whether this should be implemented as part of FSM or if it should be its own thing. But, here's a ticket for the task.
---
Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/5621890-signing-bit-http-content?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6562918&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6562918&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
I proposed a "requireSig" field in d/ a while back. This would enable trust-free website mirroring, and would allow a static website to be guaranteed safe even if the public server were completely compromised. I'm not sure whether this should be implemented as part of FSM or if it should be its own thing. But, here's a ticket for the task.