Open phelixbtc opened 10 years ago
Enforcing this in the GUI wouldn't affect squatters; they would just use namecoind (or a patched version, if we enforced this in namecoind too).
You did see my proposal to make names stop resolving early in NMControl, right? https://wiki.namecoin.info/index.php?title=User:Biolizard89/ExpireWarning
Clarified the OP. It does not protect against the squatting but against the sending of money to stolen names.
@phelixbtc I'm fine with the 1st change. Making a name stop working when it is close to expiry should be handled by this proposal IMHO: https://wiki.namecoin.info/index.php?title=User:Biolizard89/ExpireWarning . (But if that proposal is accepted, then I would certainly support applying it to sendtoname.)
@JeremyRand Yeah, the 2nd change might be of more general nature. So this issue should focus on phising prevention. Edited the OP to reflect that.
To make phishing with accidentally expired and hijacked domains more difficult it should assert that the name never expired during the last 1000 blocks or so.
(Edited: This should go somewhere else as a more general issue: Also it might be helpful to make a name non-working when it is a 1000 blocks or less before expiry so that the holder notices it easier or can be notified.)