Closed tmm1 closed 3 years ago
@tmm1 Please don't use exfat-next of linux-exfat-oot. please use #master, This is coming from #master also ?
I wanted to try the performance improvement in 223ac1af2c27061e9b523e5567d96b968a92ce97 because I was noticing some performance problem. I didn't realize rbtree patch is not yet merged in upstream or received review on lkml.
I will switch back to master. I also discovered my original performance issue was due to failing hardware drive.
Since in my cpu stall backtrace I see exfat_inode_tree_erase+0x34/0x70 [exfat]
, it seems to be a problem with the rbtree patch which introduced exfat_inode_tree_erase()
.
With master the problem is fixed.
I hope this can be helpful in improving the rbtree performance patch.
If you need help to test new versions, let me know.
Really thanks for your test!
I was just curious if there has been any v2 of the rbtree patch?
I ask because I see some performance issues sometimes inside exfat_iget
:
I'm seeing this issue with exfat-next on a raspberrypi with USB drive. Have you seen anything like it before?