Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
It's a little late to do this now. The best we can do now is try to fix the
turn count to some static number for the last n weeks of the contest.
Original comment by Jake.McA...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2010 at 5:44
Fair enough.
Original comment by guy.ki...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2010 at 11:12
If you do, please fix it to something larger than 200, as discussed in
http://ai-contest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=445
Original comment by rstar...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2010 at 8:53
As I was about to reply on the forums to yet another post requesting this that
it couldn't be done because of the backward incompatibility, I realized that in
fact it could be done in a backward compatible fashion by using special
comments.
After mentioning it on the IRC channel and jmcarthur adding that the comment
should be specially formatted so additional values could be added later without
complicating parsing. The format we agreed on was "# : key value".
Anyway here is the patch to output the turns remaining to the players. It
should change both the python and java engines to output the value each turn.
The python changes are completely untested and java changes only minimally.
Original comment by janzert
on 13 Sep 2010 at 8:00
Attachments:
Just as a note, looking at the code for the starter packages currently
available from the site (C++, Java, Python and C#). They all appear to
correctly ignore comments. I also took a look at a few of the other language
starter packages that have been posted in the forums. It appears that the Ruby,
PHP, Perl (from http://ai-contest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=621), Scala,
Javascript, Clojure and D packages all handle comments. I'm not sure about the
Common Lisp, Lua, OCaml or Racket packages. The F# package appears that will
throw an error. So overall it seems like most of the current starter packages
should work fine with this change.
Original comment by janzert
on 17 Sep 2010 at 10:33
[deleted comment]
It was pointed out to me that the F# package does actually handle comments
correctly.
Original comment by janzert
on 21 Sep 2010 at 4:03
What about passing the total number of turns as a command-line argument. In
this way new bots can parse the arguments and old bots will simply ignore
arguments in the command line.
Original comment by alexuga...@gmail.com
on 22 Sep 2010 at 3:52
There's a lot of value in knowing you didn't miss a turn and what the current
"time" is in turn numbers...
However, IMO if the bot *needs* to know precisely how many turns remain before
the end, then there's something exploitable going on with the win-criteria. The
bot is being given an artificial incentive to make tactical choices which would
normally be bad in order win on a technicality.
Original comment by hage...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2010 at 1:52
The problem with using a command line argument is there are bots that are known
to exit with an error when given an unrecognized command argument. Comments
have been part of the specification from the beginning of the contest and do
actually seem to be handled correctly by the starter packages.
Original comment by janzert
on 29 Sep 2010 at 5:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
guy.ki...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2010 at 12:54