Closed jellis18 closed 3 years ago
I support requiring sksparse and not defaulting to scipy: it's too confusing to support sparse cholesky through different libraries. Please go ahead with a PR if you have the code ready.
@vallis I'll get to this soon. I was off last week, hence the burst of activity but now it may have to wait til the weekend.
Solved by @jellis18 with #260
In two places there are try-except statements that try to import sksparse and replace it with scipy otherwise. This prints or logs a message but I think we should get rid of this and require sksparse.
Especially after #257 is merged and
scikit-sparse
becomes an official dependency