Not an issue but a question. Why does dorado correct output FASTA and not FASTQ? I would like to run NanoPlot (or something similar) to get a quality summary from the dorado correct output. I ultimately want to see how the quality changes between reads not run through dorado correct and reads that were run through dorado correct. Thank you!
Looking at the code here, it looks like we're not storing a qstring in the corrected record so I'm not sure there'd be much benefit from fastq over fasta anyway.
Not an issue but a question. Why does dorado correct output FASTA and not FASTQ? I would like to run NanoPlot (or something similar) to get a quality summary from the dorado correct output. I ultimately want to see how the quality changes between reads not run through dorado correct and reads that were run through dorado correct. Thank you!