Closed rinor closed 1 year ago
There are no known issues with running Nanos on DO, in fact I just tried creating a Nanos image and then a droplet, and everything seems to work fine: My droplet is running an example program instead of boringtun, but I don't think this makes a difference, it seems to me you encountered a problem with DigitalOcean. I'm using sfo3 as zone instead of nyc3, but this shouldn't make a difference either. I also tried creating the droplet manually from the uploaded image (also tried with different instance flavors), and it worked flawlessly. Tested with Nanos 0.1.43 and nightly. Perhaps there was a transient issue in DigitalOcean when you were using it? Your error message says "please try again in a few minutes".
Ok, thanks. Will try other zones and apps jic. Maybe I'm missing smth in the config file.
Perhaps there was a transient issue in DigitalOcean when you were using it? Your error message says "please try again in a few minutes".
It's 3 days in a row now.
Thank you.
it could easily be booting and dying very fast - if you haven't tried a simple hello world there first I'd prob do that to see if you could even do that before tackling the wireguard app
Indeed started fresh again today.
simpler
apps and they work perfectly.wireguard-go
and it works as expectedWill get back to checking boringtun-cli
, just to understand what the issue is and if it's related to nanos
.
Thank you.
It turns up that on DO, the tun interface comes up as wg3
instead of wg2
and while wireguard-go
can autoswitch to that wg3 even when instructed to expect wg2, boringtun-cli
needs the exact name.
So indeed the instance was fast failing hence DO deleted it.
Are there any new known issues on DO that prevent successful
nanos
deployments?For some reasons the instances (droplets) created by
nanos
images fail to be created/instantiated properly.Note:
.qcow2
and.raw
qemu
versions5.2
and7.2
0.1.43
,nightly
,master branch