Open eli167 opened 8 years ago
Ok I was able to start the services next is the device editor, what ip do I put there when I use the 115 like in the set up it shows my example devices please help
The reason you don’t see a “.config” after the file name is that in Windows Explorer you have the “Hide extensions for known file types” turned on. You can see that because the NanoHuesBridgeService doesn’t have a “.exe” after it, but the file type is listed as Application.
[cid:image001.png@01D1B98C.378B96B0]
You are going to have to rename the file otherwise its real name will be NanoVeraHuesBridgeService.exe.config.config and the service application wont be able to find its configuration.
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 8:35 AM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Subject: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
Ok been trying for a few days now, this is my problem first I downloaded ll your files ran the setup.exe
the file name NanoVeraHuesBridgeService.exe did not have a config after it then I added it to it [image]https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/19634081/15633307/aebdab7c-2577-11e6-90b2-f7d3c89da55c.png next what IP do I use, I tried a unused one on my network and it didn't work. then I read a reply from you to another user and changed the ip to this local box
this is the set up [image]https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/19634081/15633324/16063b14-2578-11e6-8ecf-aeb6e81e62e4.png
I try to start the service and get this error
do not know where the 10.10.1.26 came from, any help will be great
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVDudq9W2lqhjZVOK26vpsYHHVbpBks5qGYgNgaJpZM4IpR-x.
You need to know the IP of your machine.
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:22 AM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
Ok I was able to start the services next is the device editor, what ip do I put there when I use the 115 like in the set up it shows my example devices please help
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222360348, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVDutwR0RCHcTxj7ExFZZKpZgA7EIks5qGZL5gaJpZM4IpR-x.
do not think this is right can not get any information from Vera
log log.txt
Need to see a full log and you’ll want to turn up the log level.
To turn up the log level:
Open the NLog.config file
Find the line:
Capture a clean log: Stop the service Delete the log file Restart service Initiate discovery on Alexa When Alexa finishes, stop the service Send the log file.
Be helpful to provide the following info too: IP Address of the machine running the service IP Address of your Vera IP Address of your Echo
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:53 AM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
do not think this is right can not get any information from Vera
log log.txthttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/files/288362/log.txt
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222361760, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVJFT-pOgMFEXrfeO6zxLqvK8Gfpnks5qGZorgaJpZM4IpR-x.
log and reply sent waiting for your reply
Dont see a log file. Was supposed to be attached?
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 12:03 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
log and reply sent waiting for your reply
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222520750, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVMGRWLBQrFGBS63i6BXKR8x2fA3bks5qGwotgaJpZM4IpR-x.
Was emailed yesterday I can forwarded if you need On May 30, 2016 1:38 PM, "nanowebcoder" notifications@github.com wrote:
Dont see a log file. Was supposed to be attached?
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 12:03 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com
Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
log and reply sent waiting for your reply
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222520750>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVMGRWLBQrFGBS63i6BXKR8x2fA3bks5qGwotgaJpZM4IpR-x>.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222532579, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoe2I9c29-gyQHLR11qkpebps1kXPks5qGyCsgaJpZM4IpR-x .
Got this log. However the log file wasn’t the whole log file (if it were, the log file would indicate that the system was starting up, but the first message in the file is a uPNP message).
Based on what’s there the app seems to be working. It’s seeing uPNP messages. But the it’s not seeing an Echo discovery packet (it will contain the phrase “M-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1” ). Or, at least, it didn’t in the portion of the log I received.
You did tell Echo to “discover new devices” right?
What was IP address of echo?
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 3:24 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
see below
log.txthttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/files/290004/log.txt
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222544068, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVB3N_-0pLTN9xlweGPSCBckRau4-ks5qGzlrgaJpZM4IpR-x.
I did tell it to discover but it didn't find anything do you know how to find the ip of the Echo when I run wire shark I didn't see it, but I know its connected
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 5:31 PM, nanowebcoder notifications@github.com wrote:
Got this log. However the log file wasn’t the whole log file (if it were, the log file would indicate that the system was starting up, but the first message in the file is a uPNP message).
Based on what’s there the app seems to be working. It’s seeing uPNP messages. But the it’s not seeing an Echo discovery packet (it will contain the phrase “M-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1” ). Or, at least, it didn’t in the portion of the log I received.
You did tell Echo to “discover new devices” right?
What was IP address of echo?
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 3:24 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com
Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
see below
log.txt< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/files/290004/log.txt>
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222544068>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVB3N_-0pLTN9xlweGPSCBckRau4-ks5qGzlrgaJpZM4IpR-x>.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222556852, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoYW81ufrqti0h66SCHoboX6GkFxiks5qG1c1gaJpZM4IpR-x .
Easiest way is to look in your DHCP server. If you cant identify it in your devices, look in the Alexa app under settings and you can lookup the MAC address of the Echo. Then look in your DHCP for a matching MAC address.
With wireshark, you’d have to be looking for the right packets and then echo would have to be transmitting… bit more challenging.
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 7:17 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
I did tell it to discover but it didn't find anything do you know how to find the ip of the Echo when I run wire shark I didn't see it, but I know its connected
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 5:31 PM, nanowebcoder notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
Got this log. However the log file wasn’t the whole log file (if it were, the log file would indicate that the system was starting up, but the first message in the file is a uPNP message).
Based on what’s there the app seems to be working. It’s seeing uPNP messages. But the it’s not seeing an Echo discovery packet (it will contain the phrase “M-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1” ). Or, at least, it didn’t in the portion of the log I received.
You did tell Echo to “discover new devices” right?
What was IP address of echo?
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 3:24 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com<mailto:NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com<mailto:kcasey@nanoweb.com>; Comment comment@noreply.github.com<mailto:comment@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
see below
log.txt< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/files/290004/log.txt>
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222544068>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVB3N_-0pLTN9xlweGPSCBckRau4-ks5qGzlrgaJpZM4IpR-x>.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222556852, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoYW81ufrqti0h66SCHoboX6GkFxiks5qG1c1gaJpZM4IpR-x .
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-222564732, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVBsBvv5HbXq8YRvfKVCQwBiolRIFks5qG2_RgaJpZM4IpR-x.
ok more testing by me, I know the ip address of the echo now, 192.168.1.19 the echo from my Phips bridge. yet each time I do to discover, I don't see any log entries. just so you know my Echo is connected to a secondary AP my machine that has your software is plugged in to my switch, with the hue you need to press the botton in order to pair it, do we need to do anything like that
Is the secondary AP acting as a router? If so it won't pass the UDP packets
If you run wire shark (on the same network segment as the machine) do you see traffic from echo? If you don't, there's no way the bridge software will see it either
No Need to press a button. The bridge software is always listening unlike the hues bridge which will only listen when the button has been pressed.
On Jun 2, 2016, at 8:49 AM, eli167 notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
ok more testing by me, I know the ip address of the echo now, 192.168.1.19 the echo from my Phips bridge. yet each time I do to discover, I don't see any log entries. just so you know my Echo is connected to a secondary AP my machine that has your software is plugged in to my switch, with the hue you need to press the botton in order to pair it, do we need to do anything like that
You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223281237, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVGYiwiTKQ1fXxrxWreQX_vhqSDIKks5qHtFKgaJpZM4IpR-x.
The access point is not a router it's just a Cisco ap so I need to see the traffic with wire shark On Jun 2, 2016 8:56 AM, "nanowebcoder" notifications@github.com wrote:
Is the secondary AP acting as a router? If so it won't pass the UDP packets
If you run wire shark (on the same network segment as the machine) do you see traffic from echo? If you don't, there's no way the bridge software will see it either
No Need to press a button. The bridge software is always listening unlike the hues bridge which will only listen when the button has been pressed.
On Jun 2, 2016, at 8:49 AM, eli167 <notifications@github.com<mailto: notifications@github.com>> wrote:
ok more testing by me, I know the ip address of the echo now, 192.168.1.19 the echo from my Phips bridge. yet each time I do to discover, I don't see any log entries. just so you know my Echo is connected to a secondary AP my machine that has your software is plugged in to my switch, with the hue you need to press the botton in order to pair it, do we need to do anything like that
You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223281237>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVGYiwiTKQ1fXxrxWreQX_vhqSDIKks5qHtFKgaJpZM4IpR-x
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223282945, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoXExFSpDZikBisAIl1IcvIgTw653ks5qHtMCgaJpZM4IpR-x .
Most APs can be configured to function as routers—Cisco too. If the AP is configured to work as gateway (as opposed to a bridge), then it wont pass UDP packets beyond its gateway.
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 9:40 AM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
The access point is not a router it's just a Cisco ap so I need to see the traffic with wire shark On Jun 2, 2016 8:56 AM, "nanowebcoder" notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
Is the secondary AP acting as a router? If so it won't pass the UDP packets
If you run wire shark (on the same network segment as the machine) do you see traffic from echo? If you don't, there's no way the bridge software will see it either
No Need to press a button. The bridge software is always listening unlike the hues bridge which will only listen when the button has been pressed.
On Jun 2, 2016, at 8:49 AM, eli167 <notifications@github.com<mailto: mailto:notifications@github.com%3cmailto:%0b> notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
ok more testing by me, I know the ip address of the echo now, 192.168.1.19 the echo from my Phips bridge. yet each time I do to discover, I don't see any log entries. just so you know my Echo is connected to a secondary AP my machine that has your software is plugged in to my switch, with the hue you need to press the botton in order to pair it, do we need to do anything like that
You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223281237>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVGYiwiTKQ1fXxrxWreQX_vhqSDIKks5qHtFKgaJpZM4IpR-x
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223282945, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoXExFSpDZikBisAIl1IcvIgTw653ks5qHtMCgaJpZM4IpR-x .
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223294342, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVMLJl45Zn2nCNbH2wLey9vKB8Yngks5qHt0xgaJpZM4IpR-x.
its a cisco 1130AG
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM nanowebcoder notifications@github.com wrote:
Most APs can be configured to function as routers—Cisco too. If the AP is configured to work as gateway (as opposed to a bridge), then it wont pass UDP packets beyond its gateway.
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 9:40 AM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com
Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
The access point is not a router it's just a Cisco ap so I need to see the traffic with wire shark On Jun 2, 2016 8:56 AM, "nanowebcoder" <notifications@github.com<mailto: notifications@github.com>> wrote:
Is the secondary AP acting as a router? If so it won't pass the UDP packets
If you run wire shark (on the same network segment as the machine) do you see traffic from echo? If you don't, there's no way the bridge software will see it either
No Need to press a button. The bridge software is always listening unlike the hues bridge which will only listen when the button has been pressed.
On Jun 2, 2016, at 8:49 AM, eli167 <notifications@github.com<mailto: mailto:notifications@github.com%3cmailto:%0b> notifications@github.com mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
ok more testing by me, I know the ip address of the echo now, 192.168.1.19 the echo from my Phips bridge. yet each time I do to discover, I don't see any log entries. just so you know my Echo is connected to a secondary AP my machine that has your software is plugged in to my switch, with the hue you need to press the botton in order to pair it, do we need to do anything like that
You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223281237>,
or mute the thread<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVGYiwiTKQ1fXxrxWreQX_vhqSDIKks5qHtFKgaJpZM4IpR-x
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223282945>,
or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoXExFSpDZikBisAIl1IcvIgTw653ks5qHtMCgaJpZM4IpR-x>
.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223294342>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVMLJl45Zn2nCNbH2wLey9vKB8Yngks5qHt0xgaJpZM4IpR-x>.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223295141, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ASuXoTfdxZymAKCInAMZO95Y8r3jl0Z8ks5qHt3dgaJpZM4IpR-x .
please advise if there are any other tests I can do, I made sure of the IP address
You could try plugging the Echo into the same switch as the pc. You could also run wireshark on the pc and see if you can see the uPNP broadcast messages coming from the Echo. I wouldn’t normally suggest someone to run wireshark, but you seem familiar with it and it’s a great diagnostic tool.
From: eli167 [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 11:35 PM To: nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge NanoVeraHuesBridge@noreply.github.com Cc: Kevin Casey kcasey@nanoweb.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge] Setting up (#3)
please advise if there are any other tests I can do, I made sure of the IP address
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nanowebcoder/NanoVeraHuesBridge/issues/3#issuecomment-223733726, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AQjlVFBtI3UneZZ5FtER0R5UD2BYzSFnks5qIPJPgaJpZM4IpR-x.
Ok been trying for a few days now, this is my problem first I downloaded ll your files ran the setup.exe
the file name NanoVeraHuesBridgeService.exe did not have a config after it then I added it to it
next what IP do I use, I tried a unused one on my network and it didn't work. then I read a reply from you to another user and changed the ip to this local box
this is the set up![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/19634081/15633324/16063b14-2578-11e6-8ecf-aeb6e81e62e4.png)
I try to start the service and get this error
do not know where the 10.10.1.26 came from, any help will be great