In addition to estimating for HPV overall, could we also separate out the different types? Just from your current source we could distinguish 6/11, 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59, 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, and 6/11/16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68. And maybe if we used NHANES data we could get estimates for each subtype?
But this shouldn't block this PR going it -- if you wanted to do this it should be a follow-up.
But this shouldn't block this PR going it -- if you wanted to do this it should be a follow-up.
_Originally posted by @jeffkaufman in https://github.com/naobservatory/p2ra/pull/138#discussion_r1218092372_