Closed simonleandergrimm closed 1 year ago
Since this source also has AAV8 and AAVrh10, why not include them too?
Turns out virus-host DB doesn't think AAV8 is human-infecting: https://www.genome.jp/virushostdb/view/?search_text=202813
And the NCBI taxid doesn't seem to include rh10: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Undef&id=10803&lvl=3&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock
So probably adding 5 and 6 is good enough!
@jeffkaufman Flagging that this is still open.
Adds AAV5 and AAV6, and updated seroprevalence of AAV2 to represent a the unweighted global seroprevalence average.
@jeffkaufman Let me know if one PR for AAV 5 and 6 is fine or if I should have separated these.