The sampling locations in spurbeck have very different P2RA coefficients:
by_location-boxen.pdf
This seems to be because some of the sample prep methods essentially failed. @jeffkaufman and I are discussing dropping these locations from the analysis to focus on the method (EFGH) that worked better, or at least splitting the study into two.
Another options would be to add a "method" level to the hierarchical model, but this is probably more trouble than it's worth.
Alternatively, we could leave things as-is and just discuss the differences in the write-up.
The sampling locations in spurbeck have very different P2RA coefficients: by_location-boxen.pdf
This seems to be because some of the sample prep methods essentially failed. @jeffkaufman and I are discussing dropping these locations from the analysis to focus on the method (EFGH) that worked better, or at least splitting the study into two. Another options would be to add a "method" level to the hierarchical model, but this is probably more trouble than it's worth. Alternatively, we could leave things as-is and just discuss the differences in the write-up.