Open bdlamprecht opened 7 years ago
Currently, in the validate section, it can be difficult to see differences between what is desired and that is the actual value.
This is to request some type of requested_value in addition to the existing actual_value in the compliance_report.
requested_value
actual_value
compliance_report
For example (using the Ansible napalm_validate module):
napalm_validate
TASK [debug] ******************************************** ok: [btv-vba-a] => { "dev_validate": { "changed": false, "compliance_report": { "complies": false, "get_facts": { "complies": false, "extra": [], "missing": [], "present": { "hostname": { "requested_value: "foo-bar", "actual_value": "btv-vba-a", "complies": false, "nested": false } } }, "skipped": [] } } }
Currently, in the validate section, it can be difficult to see differences between what is desired and that is the actual value.
This is to request some type of
requested_value
in addition to the existingactual_value
in thecompliance_report
.For example (using the Ansible
napalm_validate
module):