Closed bkeifer closed 7 years ago
So, Travis wants the XML test file to be named get-bridge-mac-table.xml
, but the RPC command isn't get-bridge-mac-table
, it's get-ethernet-switching-table
.
Maintainers, what's your preferred way to proceed (assuming this is a PR you're interested in)?
It looks like the only error we're getting now is that Travis wants me to rename the .xml test file:
> raise IOError("Couldn't find file with mocked data: {}".format(full_path)) E IOError: Couldn't find file with mocked data: /home/travis/build/napalm-automation/napalm-junos/test/unit/mocked_data/test_get_mac_address_table/l2ng/get-bridge-mac-table.xml
Unless I'm reading things incorrectly, and I might be since I don't have access to much of the other Juniper gear that these tests are geared towards, it looks like these files in the other directories are named after the rpc command that produces the output.
So I'm back to my original question. Should I rename my get-ethernet-switching-table.xml
file to get-bridge-mac-table.xml
or is there a way to tell Travis to look for a different file name in the test_get_mac_address_table/l2ng
directory?
(This is the first project on which I'm really working with test cases, so I wholeheartedly thank you for your patience!)
@bkeifer FYI I closed this PR and included your commits into https://github.com/napalm-automation/napalm-junos/pull/203
Newer Juniper switches (Including EX2300, EX4300, EX4600, EX9200 and QFX series) use the L2NG configuration syntax. As a result, their XML output for
get-ethernet-switching-table-information
is also slightly different. This was causingget_mac_address_table()
to return an empty set on our EX2300 and EX4300 switches.This PR adds another table structure and view for these switches and updates the logic in
get_mac_address_table()
to identify these new switches using theswitch_style
fact.