The assumption done on eth_link_flapped is not correct.
There are several format for this parameter.
I came accross the following in addition of the current :
5d08h06:06:06
Coverage increased (+1.7%) to 68.943% when pulling 982414eba01cd75423b085ce0ab9eb66e6f928b3 on targuan:bugfix/last_flap_time into 6d24e88718d1608dc27db09af9849ee117b74151 on napalm-automation:develop.
The assumption done on eth_link_flapped is not correct. There are several format for this parameter. I came accross the following in addition of the current :
5d08h
06:06:06