Closed brisvag closed 3 weeks ago
@Czaki the failing example is related to 2d hash in labels... is it even relevant anymore? If so, could you fix it?
No. We have changed the hashing mechanism. I will try to check it tomorrow.
The current mechanism is totally different, so I think that whole example could be removed.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 92.41%. Comparing base (
9fcf63e
) to head (9873f26
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I don't liek the idea of having test-specific code in the examples... I'd rather just skip this one or refactor it ^^'
I don't liek the idea of having test-specific code in the examples... I'd rather just skip this one or refactor it ^^'
Hm. Looking to documentation, maybe we should just monkeypatch sys.argv
?
A number of alterations are also made to the sys module. Firstly, sys.path may be altered as described above. sys.argv[0] is updated with the value of path_name and sys.modules[name] is updated with a temporary module object for the module being executed. All modifications to items in sys are reverted before the function returns.
What do you think of this version?
Fail seems unrelated.
References and relevant issues
Alternative to #6763.
Description
Test dev examples to ensure they don't go out of sync.