Open ysangkok opened 1 year ago
I think maybe I would rather re-define the language so to be able to argue that this is not a bug; that my own "plox is not lox" language is intended to work like this.
fixing this is just a matter of implementing the resolver and following the book, my proposed reaction "this is not a bug because plox is not lox" seems more interesting; potentially more illuminating
ok good to know! but with every deviation it becomes harder to compare... not sure how to keep track of the differences
The error from resolving and binding seems to be present. You probably know, but now you know i know :P