Open narwhalsilent opened 4 months ago
This is not a bug or feature flaw.
We took into account that since ID is our unique identifier, we would simple use that directly in the edit command without the /id portion so that users can enter the edit command faster.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: I agree with the team that it is reasonable to leave out the /id
prefix if the ID is used as the unique identifier of persons.
However, if such a principle were in place, the same should apply for the delete command, and even the add command too.
On the contrary, /id
prefix is compulsory in delete and add commands.
The original bug precisely concerns the inconsistency in how the prefix /id
is used.
However, as indicated below, I agree that this bug is a feature flaw and not a functionality bug, because the application behaves correctly according to UG.
Commands like delete requires
/id
flag before inputting id.However, the edit command does not require the flag.
This can be confusing and lead to more errors in executing commands.
Improvement: Add
/id
for edit command.