Open twchristian opened 2 years ago
There is a known issue in v1.5 with where interpretation of multi-byte bitfields (that is, parameters of type uint16, uint32, etc with "bit length" specified) is not consistent between encoding and decoding, at least for little-endian targets.
There is a known issue in v1.5 with where interpretation of multi-byte bitfields (that is, parameters of type uint16, uint32, etc with "bit length" specified) is not consistent between encoding and decoding, at least for little-endian targets.