Closed VWoeltjen closed 10 years ago
In terms of version, this is reproducible on afec83f703b28909eed954a5a5b04f9acd5d7965 but not 0436d5d5559ed8c8964cb5cd1c818e230525268b; should be straightforward to track down cause of regression using git bisect
Pursuing with git bisect
points to 4b58447c76cae4407bf907838e6726c374d44825 as the commit which introduced the issue:
4b58447c76cae4407bf907838e6726c374d44825 is the first bad commit
commit 4b58447c76cae4407bf907838e6726c374d44825
Author: Victor Woeltjen <victor.woeltjen@nasa.gov>
Date: Fri Dec 27 09:44:41 2013 -0800
[Scenario] Separate static costs from cost functions
Draw a distinction between costs and cost
functions. This is to help distinguish
between costs from Activity Types and costs
from sub-activities, to support correct
overlay for MCT-Plugins#119
:040000 040000 ba7ac300ed2e8bc3699f5a1ba133b6c0016f47aa 2301311e43a98cb7140f194052238b8c85931e7e M scenario
In the Info View for an Activity with an assigned Activity Type, the assigned Activity Type does not always appear in capsule form in the user interface under Associations > Activity Type. Appears to be a regression (looking at same object which prior version of software shows the Activity Type, as it should.)
Note that this user interface is being redesigned for #129 and #130, and depending on root cause of the regression this may come from obsolete code.