Closed chrisjrd closed 5 months ago
Yes - I've already checked
When querying for MS_159_180 and MS_160_1 bursts at low coverage target, bursts were only evaluating against 159_180 rather than both.
I expected bursts to be evaluated against both set IDs
See OPERAVNV-54
- INT
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
Describe the bug
When querying for MS_159_180 and MS_160_1 bursts at low coverage target, bursts were only evaluating against 159_180 rather than both.
What did you expect?
I expected bursts to be evaluated against both set IDs
Reproducible steps
Environment