Closed collinss-jpl closed 3 months ago
Latest product spec can be downloaded from Artifactory-FN under the path general/gov/nasa/jpl/opera/adt/dswx_s1/r4.2/calval/documents/OPERA_DSWx_S1_ProductSpec_Calval_point_2_R4.2.docx
The section of the ISO template with the product metadata starts here: https://github.com/nasa/opera-sds-pge/blob/977a059baaeb3284bd4832d1fd8c7dc6fde406d8/src/opera/pge/dswx_s1/templates/OPERA_ISO_metadata_L3_DSWx_S1_template.xml.jinja2#L576
After comparing DSWx-S1 product metadata with the product spec and the ISO metadata, the following has been determined:
PROCESSING_INFORMATION_WORKFLOW
is not present within the DSWx-S1 metadata. The CalVal product spec states that this field should be set to "DSWx-S1" as the workflow. Since this is probably redundant info, it should be removed from the product spec (will need to verify when documentation for Final delivery is provided)All other changes listed in the ticket description will be addressed for the v3.0.0-rc.3.0 delivery of the DSWx-S1 PGE.
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
Describe the bug
As part of V&V testing for the DSWx-S1 PGE, the following discrepancies were reported between the ISO.xml and the metadata as described within the Product Spec Document (PSD):
What did you expect?
For finding 1, any references to the shoreline shapefile ancillary within the ISO.xml template for DSWx-S1 should be removed.
For finding 2, the metadata within a sample DSWx-S1 product needs to be examined to see if it is missing from there, or just from the iso.xml. If it is missing from the product, then ADT should update the Product Spec Document to remove PROCESSING_INFORMATION_WORKFLOW
For findings 3 and 4, the names used in the ISO.xml should be updated to match the names used in the PSD
Reproducible steps
Environment