@newtpatrol was testing 3.14.2 and noticed that QF.tif had some 0 values around the watershed, where it looks like nodata values should be. I found that the monthly QF is where this is introduced. I'm not yet sure if it's part of the logic of the function _calculate_monthly_quickflow_flow or if it's a nodata masking bug.
@newtpatrol was testing 3.14.2 and noticed that
QF.tifhad some 0 values around the watershed, where it looks likenodatavalues should be. I found that the monthly QF is where this is introduced. I'm not yet sure if it's part of the logic of the function_calculate_monthly_quickflow_flowor if it's a nodata masking bug.