Closed joneshf closed 6 years ago
Oh, I just realized there are no At
alternates for aff/eff. Will add later today.
cc @natefaubion
Thanks! This looks good.
Will add later today.
That turned out to be a lie :sweat_smile:.
While getting ready to add them, I realized there's runBaseAff'
which requires two labels being chosen:
Didn't know what to do there, and then forgot to ping you about it. What do you think. Do you want unlabled aff/eff? If so, should runBaseAffAt'
take two labels, or should there be no equivalent function?
I don't think it's necessary for Aff/Eff to be unlabelled because they are essentially primitive effects.
Re: #12.
Adds the
At
alternates for most all of the functions. Doesn't add unlabeled alternates forRun.Choose
as that has typeclass stuff going on.Let me know if there's anything you'd like changed.