Closed nateosher closed 1 year ago
Thanks @nateosher ! What do you recommend for helping this test pass? Changing the agg function? Using more slide ids per patient?
Would it be alright if I just made a new pull request with some equivalent tests, and we can merge that? I actually think the two patients per group is a good test data set
Sounds good to me! Thanks!
Joel Eliason
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, 1:28 PM nateosher @.***> wrote:
Would it be alright if I just made a new pull request with some equivalent tests, and we can merge that? I actually think the two patients per group is a good test data set
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nateosher/DistDist/pull/43#issuecomment-1468527046, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC44PS3N2BNSF7LMWKFW6CTW4CTE7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAVZNGB5Y . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +4.92
:tada:
Comparison is base (
b4c673b
) 64.71% compared to head (1de0617
) 69.64%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
@jeliason I think I figured out the error! Will send an email