Updated to python3, added mqtt option, allows for initial no data package

[strahl]

Hello nathanfaber,

first a big thanks to you and your contributors, it allowed me to use my Meater from my linux laptop within minutes. :)

I changed the print command to be python3 ready and added a command line interface that allows to optionally send the data to a mqtt server.

I also had the problem when I started readMeater.py and then took the Meater out of the charging box that the first package was empty. Therefore I added a "no data" handling. I think this might also help in #5 .

Please let me know if you would like some changes (e.g. JSON format).

Thanks again and greetings from Germany :) stefan

[nathanfaber]

Thanks for the contribution, I'm glad you were able get it running quickly.

This looks good but I'd like to keep the external modules to a minimum (click/mqtt) so people can just run it and see the dumped output quickly so they can see it working. Is there a way you would like to factor those two components out?

We could have a keep the basic readMeater and add your more enhanced one. I'm also fine with having a dumpMeater or something as well. There isn't much structure to the project so I'm up for anything really.

[strahl]

Ah sorry, I overlooked this. It is indeed a good idea to keep the readMeater.py as easy as possible to be used.

I like the idea to add a more enhanced version, what about readMeater_mqtt.py? Or publishMeater.py? Not 100% satisfied with the names, do you have perhaps a better idea?

[nathanfaber]

publishMeater.py or mqttMeater.py sounds good to me. Also, are you launching with the run.sh helper? We can make that take an optional first argument that defaults to readMeater.py and then we can use ./run.sh mqttMeater.py or whatever.

[arzaman]

Has the publishMeater.py or mqttMeater.py been released ? where I can find ? thanks Davide