Closed dlaxar closed 10 years ago
What's most irritating, the existence of tablet-*
classes?
Or, the lack of exhaustive documentation?
I'm happy to add a note about tablet-*
support, but I felt like the documentation would've been needlessly heavy, if every example included it. Not to mention, that it would only be applicable if using a "tablet" flavor of the CSS.
Do you think it would be sufficient to have a general blurb?
I'm thinking something to the effect of:
"Note: Everywhere that a mobile-*
class is mentioned, there is also a corresponding tablet-*
class, if using a CSS file that has tablet
in its name."
Alrighty, I added some text explaining that tablet classes exist…
The "general blurb" is what I meant. Thanks :)
Welcome! :)
Here: http://unsemantic.com/css-documentation#4-mobile-amp-hidden-classes
It only mentions mobile-* classes but not that those classes are also available for tablet-* which is quite irritating.