Closed nathggns closed 12 years ago
Woops, did not mean for the patch1 commit to make it's way in. Please merge that pull request first.
No, just add a rule for checking if something is given/not empty.
We could have those as well as this, to be fair. I don't see any reason for not including this?
Closed in favour of Issues #22 and #24
At the moment, if you write a rule, and test it with data missing for that rule, it just ignores it. For example:
That will pass. I think we should have an option where you can say if the Validator should error at missing values, and for missing rules.
So now we have this:
P.S. Yes, I know the branch name is incorrectly spelt.