Missing MAPR boundary

[nateirwin]

A new park. May be a tough one.

[chadlawlis]

From talk-us-nps OSM mailing list:

the new site will cover three locations: Hanford, Washington; Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Park is to be announced today, still no boundary from IRMA.

[chadlawlis]

Share this with Clifford Snow clifford@snowandsnow.us when available.

[chadlawlis]

From Roger @ Lands, this is set for inclusion in next Lands release:

There is a Federal Register notice coming out this month. I'll include the MAPR boundary in the next IRMA update after this announcement.

[chadlawlis]

Unfortunately this was not actually included in the latest Lands release 20160107.

I reached out to Roger @ Lands again today to see if he has anything he could pass along.

[chadlawlis]

insert into parks (unit_id, unit_name_short, unit_name_long, unit_desig_abbr, unit_desig_full, unit_code, unit_state, unit_url) values ((select max(unit_id) + 1 from parks), 'Manhattan Project', 'Manhattan Project', 'NHP', 'National Historical Park', 'mapr', 'nm,wa,tn', 'http://www.nps.gov/mapr/index.htm');
insert into parks_poly (unit_id, unit_code) values ((select unit_id from parks where unit_code = 'mapr'), 'mapr');
insert into parks_line (unit_id, unit_code) values ((select unit_id from parks where unit_code = 'mapr'), 'mapr');

[chadlawlis]

An official boundary is now available with the latest Lands release 20160331. Updating to this will be handled via #697.

[chadlawlis]

The tiles were regenerated since #697 was completed but I can't seem to find the MAPR boundary in PT3. Some of the site areas in TN should be showing up around here, starting at Z14: http://insidemaps.nps.gov/park-tiles-3/#16/35.9843/-84.2572.

Reopening this - Jim to run boundaries this afternoon, so I'll check back in after that.

[chadlawlis]

These are now live.