nus-pe-bot
commented
3 years ago Team's Response
This is an intended feature. The rationale is to facilitate the conversion from any paper records into Pawbook, out of which the users might be trying to digitalize all their records. The timings in the past will also help facilitate future planning, since some programmes are seasonal and the user might need to reference to older timings to ensure that they keep things consistent.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Programs have "timeslot(s)" field, which doesnt check if it has already passed.
Command used:
add program n/Program 1 s/01-01-2020