Closed alberk8 closed 8 months ago
it might be nanoseconds, could you try that? We changed everything to be TimeSpan but missed this one I think 🤔
I have changed to MicroSeconds and there is no difference. The Re-Delivery went through in quick succession.
Looking at the source code, it does not seems that Backoff is implemented.
I have changed to MicroSeconds and there is no difference. The Re-Delivery went through in quick succession.
it's should be nano .. another x1000
Looking at the source code, it does not seems that Backoff is implemented.
I think this is just passed to the server, I don't think there is anything to implement on client side, is there?
Thanks. I really missed it. Nanoseconds did the trick. It is working as expected.
Observed behavior
With code below it looks like the backoff is not in effect. Also there is no reference anywhere in the source.
Expected behavior
Backoff Setting works
Server and client version
Server: v2.10.11 Client: NATS.Client.JetStream v2.1.2
Host environment
Official NATS docker (latest) with JetStream enabled.
Steps to reproduce