Closed brownidj closed 11 years ago
They should all match! For example, if it says:
"Example 4.5 Particle Blah Blah"
in the text, you'll find:
NOC_4_05_Particle_Blah_Blah
in the examples.
For the exercises, I think I'm just missing some. But if you see
Exercise I.1 Walker
Then you'll find
Exercise_I_1_Walker
in the examples.
I just fixed the intro:
https://github.com/shiffman/The-Nature-of-Code-Examples/commit/c49bbbaa8f068aa6e31d3d53e963c847cb1660ad https://github.com/shiffman/The-Nature-of-Code-Examples/commit/d6a3f69b20bf6c9f2714219904f4e023bef3bb1c
Let me know if you see any more that don't match!
(Maybe I could come up with a more clear naming convention, but this is what I have for now. I can always rename the files in the repo later if you have ideas. The book, however, is getting set as of this week.)
Perhaps in 2nd Edition, it would be worth changing the naming of sketch examples and exercises to a scheme that followed Processing's sketch naming conventions more consistently. This would allow the code examples in The-Nature-of-Code-Examples-master to be found more easily.
For example, in the Intro in the PDF (28/519) The exercise is I.1 whilst the Sketch folder is called: NOC_I_3_RandomWalkTendsToRight. So although this is the first exercise, it is not distinguished from the examples...
Sorry to be pedantic - feel free to ignore! I don't have a particular scheme in mind but, by way of penance, I would be willing to work a suggestion out if that would help!