Closed Jodokus closed 8 years ago
Indeed. :-)
Aw shucks thanks so much for catching this! I sent the final version to print a proof on Friday so I may not get this fixed for the 1st print edition, but will update the illustration so that it's corrected online, in the PDF, and all future print versions.
Daniel,
No thanks. Thanks for the nice tutorial and examples.
Hans de Jong (Jodokus) ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Shiffman To: shiffman/The-Nature-of-Code Cc: Jodokus Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [The-Nature-of-Code] Explaining dot product 6.7 (#276)
Aw shucks thanks so much for catching this! I sent the final version to print a proof on Friday so I may not get this fixed for the 1st print edition, but will update the illustration so that it's corrected online, in the PDF, and all future print versions.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
fixed many moons ago.
It says: -3_10+5_1=-30+5=35. After much checking I still suspect it should be -25