Closed Davidyao99 closed 2 months ago
Hi, It's not surprising -> we didn't train it for this. The prediction for img1 is usually more accurate than the one for img2, so it should be better to just take the output from pred1.
Hello
I see, thank you so much for the quick response!
David
I am trying to use Dust3r to obtain depth maps for a single image. I fed in the same image twice into the model for inference. I was expecting the pts3d from pred1 and pts3d_in_other_view from pred2 to match, but it appears that there is a non-zero difference between the two predictions (difference is of the order 1e-3, with actual values in the order of 1e-1).
Is this expected behavior? And if so, should I just take the output from pred1 as the depth? or average the two results to get a better depth estimation?
Thanks and great work!