Closed davidwindell closed 7 years ago
Honestly, I have no plans to add Alpine-based image here. It is smaller in general, but I'm typically using it with other official debian:jessie
-based images (like these: https://github.com/nazar-pc/docker-webserver) overhead is basically negligible, since base image is the same and I assume software added on top of base image should be comparable in size.
Also I do not want to maintain something that I'm not familiar with (all of my systems are Debian/Ubuntu).
In my opinion maintenance burden doesn't really worth minor benefits in size.
What are your use cases where Alpine-based image might fit better?
I think we're talking about a 50mb saving in compressed download and around 175mb uncompressed. As this is such a simple tool that can be spun up at a moments notice, it would be more appealing I think if it was that little bit faster.
Happy to close this for now until there's more community support.
To reduce disk footprint, it would be great to have an Alpine version which could extend from
php:7.1-alpine
.A shared shell script could be used by two Dockerfiles to determine which is in use (something like this https://github.com/davidwindell/che/blob/master/agents/exec/src/main/resources/org.eclipse.che.exec.script.sh#L102).