Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
As explained in the README.txt file, please try to call the function this way:
arDetectMarker(..., markers.position(0), ...)
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2013 at 10:42
Hello Samuel,
Thanks for your fast answer,
I try your solution "markers.position(0)" but the results are the same for two
examples in file source code.
Any others ideas will be welcome.
Thanks
Original comment by stef.pre...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2013 at 12:41
I've looked at this and the results look alright. I'm not sure where you got
markerboard_480-499.png, but I tried with markerboard_480-499.jpg, and with the
C++ code I am attaching, and I get similar output:
- id 0 : -1 conf : 0.000000
- id 1 : -1 conf : 0.000000
- id 2 : -1 conf : 0.000000
- id 3 : -1 conf : 0.000000
- id 4 : 489 conf : 0.944444
- id 5 : 488 conf : 1.000000
- id 6 : 487 conf : 1.000000
- id 7 : -1 conf : 0.000000
- id 8 : -1 conf : 0.000000
- id 9 : 493 conf : 1.000000
- id 10 : 492 conf : 1.000000
- id 11 : 491 conf : 1.000000
- id 12 : 498 conf : 1.000000
- id 13 : 497 conf : 1.000000
- id 14 : 496 conf : 1.000000
This looks alright to me, but if it doesn't to you, then the problem isn't
related with JavaCV, but with ARToolKitPlus.
As a side note, newer versions of ARToolKitPlus may give different results and
may have missing functions you are looking for: issue #234
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2013 at 2:22
Attachments:
FYI, I've made changes to support ARToolKitPlus 2.3.0, which contains at least
some of the functions you were looking for:
http://code.google.com/p/javacv/source/detail?r=b80bcf5cceacc8453511890fed9d93c8
7fa91d71
Let me know if you see anything missing from that, thanks!
Original comment by samuel.a...@gmail.com
on 22 Jun 2013 at 3:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
stef.pre...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2013 at 1:56Attachments: