Closed sophiathirza closed 4 years ago
Before making any changes to this, it would be good to investigate how the name matching works in this case.
In our database, Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser is an accepted name: https://species.nbnatlas.org/species/NBNSYS0000002897 . So is Rorippa islandica (Oeder ex Gunnerus) Borbás: https://species.nbnatlas.org/species/NHMSYS0000462432
But as you noted, 'Rorippa palustris' (without authority) is a synonym of Rorippa islandica (Oeder ex Gunnerus) Borbás (as per https://species.nbnatlas.org/species/NHMSYS0000462432#names) .
Given that the naked name was provided for the record, this was matched to 'Rorippa palustris', i.e. the synonym, rather than to the accepted name with the authority. I can see the value of preferentially matching a name to an accepted name, regardless of whether the authority was provided or not, but this could have some unexpected side-effects.
For interest, we have about 19 900 species synonyms without authorities. It might be expected that any records provided with these names will be matched to the accepted name for the naked name in question, regardless of whether there is an accepted name matching the provided name, but with an authority.
This is misleading: 'Rorippa palustris' (without authority) is a synonym of Rorippa islandica (Oeder ex Gunnerus) Borbás (as per https://species.nbnatlas.org/species/NHMSYS0000462432#names), because although it doesn't have an authority it does have a name qualifier, which is missing on the names tab.
I have added a message to the forum: https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=7424 to ask for feedback on changing the name matching routine to not match ambiguous names.
Note on how the UKSI bulk name matching tool works:
When multiple results are found they are prioritised in the following way:
Recommended names before synonyms
Names without attributes over attributed names
Other variations of a recommended name above junior synonyms
Well-formed names over ill-formed names
Here are the stats on how we match our names:
taxonIdMatch: 221,548,378 exactMatch: 630,915 noMatch: 379,852 - many of these are where the supplied tvk was for a common name canonicalMatch: 39,819 higherMatch: 7,225 fuzzyMatch: 1,595 vernacularMatch: 25
I don't know what the terms canonical, higher or fuzzy really mean.
Examples for testing later on:
Exact: https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=name_match_metric%3AexactMatch
Canonical (some of these could be incorrectly matched): https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=name_match_metric%3AcanonicalMatch
Higher (some of these look a bit suspicious): https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=name_match_metric%3AhigherMatch
Fuzzy https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=name_match_metric%3AvernacularMatch
Common name: https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=name_match_metric%3AvernacularMatch
The following record has a supplied scientific name of Rorippa palustris. The Atlas has (incorrectly) matched the name to Rorippa islandica: https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/a07aab28-a2a1-4032-8382-b9dd75d7ac03
In the UKSI, Rorippa palustris auct., non (L.) Besser is a synonym of Rorippa islandica (Oeder ex Gunnerus) Borbás: http://nbn-sd-dev.nhm.ac.uk/taxonbrowser.php?txtSearch=Rorippa+islandica
It looks like the name matching routine has matched Rorippa palustris to Rorippa islandica rather than to the recommended name (http://nbn-sd-dev.nhm.ac.uk/taxon.php?linkKey=NBNSYS0000002897) Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser, i.e. has taken the synonym match over a recommended name.
Apparently there is another example of this mistake, which I am waiting for.