Closed gokdumano closed 4 years ago
The point isn't to call someone out, but inform the reader how someone who is terrible can still have friends and influence others; using a piece of history is just a way to do that.
From my experience, for that sort of thing, you may inject some redundancy to get the intentional message across, leaving the fact intact.
- "Didn't Charles Manson, who was a cult leader and serial killer, win friends and influence people?"
Alternatively, if you really want to avoid foreign names
- "Aren't serial killers throughout history often notorious for being able to win friends and influence people?"
If you are really confident, you may then attempt to swap a fact for another that your readers are more likely to already know of, in order to get the same effect. In my case, for instance, I felt comfortable replacing the Rhode Island nightclub fire with the Boate Kiss fire which not only was arguably worse but more fresh in the recent memory of my country.
in act4.md, line 925, it says:
Did you guys localize it or keep it original? I don't think people in my country know who Charles Manson is, but we have some other similar figures. To deliver the message, I think localizing it would be better, what you say?