Some typographical love and minor accessibility improvements

[iblech]

A couple of these are obviously judgment calls. Call as you wish. :-)

I changed "shtuff" to "stuff" because I assume that it was a typo. I don't think that the Urban Dictionary definition of "shtuff" appropriately describes your work! I liked this new installment of yours and will recommend it.

[iblech]

I'll add a minor comment: In "All the more reason for small towns, local states, and nations like Canada to be pioneers, to bravely experiment!" the word "nations" has no accompanying adjective. The adjectives before that denote some kind of smallness ("small", "local"). Thus, in the mind of some readers, they might carry over to Canada, implying that Canada is small in some sense. This is probably not what you intended.

Just pointing this out. Personally I'm not disturbed at all by this formulation, but I could imagine that some people might be. Some suggestions, none of which actually sound good to me:

• "indeed nations" (slightly agrammatical)
• "big nations"
• "global nations"
• "progressive nations" (has a political side message)

[ncase]

Thanks @iblech! But I'll keep the words and typography the same, my lil' idiosyncracies. Also, re: "shtuff"