Closed youkha closed 6 years ago
This can be improved. Currently both molecules are considered as selected and thus both are included in the surface display. I will make the "alternate" command to alternate the surface as well.
great! Make sure one can operate on each surface independently as you would do on 2 molecules (say color/transparency) I guess alternate would allow that and then you could display both together
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jiyao Wang notifications@github.com wrote:
This can be improved. Currently both molecules are considered as selected and thus both are included in the surface display. I will make the "alternate" command to alternate the surface as well.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ncbi/icn3d/issues/16#issuecomment-321604510, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APfWoXUdAf4a3NaXrtVzxeoBd4FSZ8B7ks5sWzB9gaJpZM4Os3B9 .
-- -- Philippe Youkharibache, Ph.D. US +1 415 448 6509
Yes.
This is implemented in the new version iCn3D 2.0.0.
AN issue in surfacing superimposed molecules: it creates a composite surface for both molecules the when you "alternate" between the two you alternate only the backbone representation, not the surfae representation. The surface should be linked to each molecule and one could see alternatively the surface of one vcs the surfave of the other. This feature may also be useful in "alternating" viewing surfaces of 2 molecules/chains forming an interface (or any set in generalizing the concept)