Closed syphax-bouazzouni closed 2 months ago
Merging #162 (81c7977) into master (b5057b4) will decrease coverage by
0.02%
. The diff coverage is70.00%
.:exclamation: Current head 81c7977 differs from pull request most recent head ba7a7f8. Consider uploading reports for the commit ba7a7f8 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #162 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 80.75% 80.72% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 63 63
Lines 4848 4857 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 3915 3921 +6
- Misses 933 936 +3
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 80.72% <70.00%> (-0.03%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lib/ontologies_linked_data/serializers/json.rb | 79.22% <70.00%> (-1.67%) |
:arrow_down: |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
already implemented via PR #199 https://github.com/ncbo/ontologies_linked_data/commit/36a5b68c38a02e0b221ba7b7bfc1169dc14ea01f
Issue
If we take as an example the NLMVS ontology, which is SKOS terminology with only SKOS Concepts (no OWL ontology)
But when we check one of its concepts like Intraspinal abscess (disorder) , our API tell us that is of
@type: "owl:Class"
(see screenshot below)This PR fix that, by displaying the correct type, skos:Concept if SKOS and owl:Class if Ontology
After