Closed alexskr closed 5 months ago
Attention: 30 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
4b6b7f4
) 80.76% compared to head (5900570
) 79.96%. Report is 9 commits behind head on master.:exclamation: Current head 5900570 differs from pull request most recent head 1e8bd29. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1e8bd29 to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
lib/ontologies_linked_data/utils/notifications.rb | 61.97% | 27 Missing :warning: |
lib/ontologies_linked_data/utils/notifier.rb | 94.82% | 3 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The screenshot below was provided as an example of the notification that an ontology owner receives after a successful processing. The text of "Parsed successfully" directly followed by "Obsolete" is confusing, and I believe will generate traffic on our support list from users asking what this means. I object to releasing this in production without addressing this.
obsolete
submission status in the REST API is associated with determining obsolete classes and properties. Including this status in email notification can create some confusion so it should not be included in the email notification
..
The screenshot below was provided as an example of the notification that an ontology owner receives after a successful processing. The text of "Parsed successfully" directly followed by "Obsolete" is confusing, and I believe will generate traffic on our support list from users asking what this means. I object to releasing this in production without addressing this.
addressed by https://github.com/ncbo/ontologies_linked_data/commit/c77d0b390e19c394989e9467e447fcc653b53fa5
Changes:
186