Closed Gualor closed 3 years ago
As I know they all can be used to calculate SNR, for example in paper "Canonical Correlation Analysis Applied to Remove Muscle Artifacts From the Electroencephalogram'' and paper "Independent Vector Analysis Applied to Remove Muscle Artifacts in EEG Data"
Hi, thank you for the reply! I will try to be more concise and clear with my question.
I'm using the following additive relationship to describe how noise affects the final signal: y = x + k*n
where y
is the noisy EEG signal, x
is the clean EEG signal, n
is the noise (EOG or EMG) and k
is a coefficient to parametrize how much n affects y.
By substituting this relationship inside the definition of SNR we get:
SNR = MSE(x) / MSE(k*n) = MSE(x) / ((k^2) * MSE(n))
If we solve the equation for k we get:
k = sqrt(MSE(x) / (SNR * MSE(n)) = RMS(x) / (RMS(n) * sqrt(SNR))
Which is different from the equation used in EEGdenoiseNet/code/benchmark_networks/data_input.py
line 56 where there is no square root of the SNR in the denominator.
coe=get_rms(eeg)/(get_rms(noise)*SNR_train[i])
# Shoud be changed into this:
coe=get_rms(eeg)/(get_rms(noise)*math.sqrt(SNR_train[i]))
Please let me know if it is an error on your side or I'm missing something.
BR
Thanks for your reply! In this two papers, SNR is defined by: different with We also feel surprise for this difference, because this 2 paper are important in the area of EEG denoise, so we use the first defination. Best regards
Thank you, I finally understand now. Have a nice day.
Best regards, LG
Hi! I'm currently working on a denoising CNN for EOG artifacts. I am implementing a similar procedure to the one described in your paper which cleverly parametrizes the artifact contaminations in the signal by computing the signal with the desired SNR levels to match the physiological ones.
However I couldn't understand why in the
EEGdenoiseNet/code/benchmark_networks/data_input.py
script you computed the SNR using the RMS instead of the MSE in the ratio.Line 56 shows:
meaning that
Being the definition of SNR the ratio of powers of signal and noise shouldn't the SNR be estimated with MSE as or alternatively using RMS as .
Please let me know if I am missing something. Thank you again for your work.
BR