Closed kristenanton closed 3 months ago
@adamjtaylor do you think we can add this one to our current sprint?
@kristenanton will dig into this a bit more and consider a suitable strategy here. May submit a separate ticket relating to ICD codes
@adamjtaylor notes that this is a good opportunity to leverage data model modularization approach that other communities have leveraged, which maintains valid values separately. Consider whether to file a separate ticket on this.
I'm happy that we can do changes 1 and 3 now.
I would suggest NOT updating the two HTAPP participants at this stage.
We can do two (make required) ahead of the renewal once we have locked all HTAN 1.0 data submission
This is excellent, Adam! Thanks - Kristen
Kristen Anton Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Department of Medicine UNC at Chapel Hill
From: Adam Taylor @.> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 6:10 AM To: ncihtan/data-models @.> Cc: Anton, Kristen @.>; Assign @.> Subject: Re: [ncihtan/data-models] move Precancerous Condition Type from Clinical Tier 2 to Clinical Tier 1 Diagnosis (Issue #355)
I'm happy that we can do changes 1 and 3 now.
I would suggest NOT updating the two HTAPP participants at this stage.
We can do two (make required) ahead of the renewal once we have locked all HTAN 1.0 data submission
β Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ncihtan/data-models/issues/355#issuecomment-1985505311, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AR6XN33ZKR6PD7LYPCOLB6TYXGMBJAVCNFSM6AAAAABEGIMXHCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSOBVGUYDKMZRGE. You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
Completed 1 and 3 as part of 24-3 close out.
2 will be completed as part of future data model work in the renewal
Proposal
This model change is proposed to capture information on, and to clearly identify, precancer cases.
Proposed changes:
At present, only two records have been submitted with data in the Precancerous Condition Type field (they are HTAPP participants HTA2_225 and HTA2_229).
Proposed change 2 above impacts data already submitted too significantly, we could omit change 2 and proceed with changes 1 and 3.
How important is this feature?
It would be ideal to move this into the current sprint, if possible.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here
Implementation checklist
HTAN.model.csv
editied and pushedHTAN.model.jsonld
validated and created by Github actionmain
ncihtan/HTAN-data-curator
(if required)