Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Thanks for the bug report.
The way CREST is currently implemented, it can track the flow of symbolic
values only
through locations which have addresses (i.e. essentially all C locations except
for
bitfields). Thus, it does not support marking a bitfield as symbolic.
This may be fixed in a future version of CREST using bit-precise modeling of
memory.
For the time being, however, I am marking this bug as WontFix.
I will also add some documentation indicating that CREST_int, etc., cannot be
used on
bitfields.
Original comment by jbur...@gmail.com
on 11 Aug 2009 at 7:51
Original comment by jbur...@gmail.com
on 11 Aug 2009 at 7:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kiran.la...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2009 at 9:08