NLP and context with udpipe

[dylanbeaudette]

• https://bnosac.github.io/udpipe/en/
• http://www.bnosac.be/index.php/blog/93-dependency-parsing-with-udpipe
• http://www.bnosac.be/index.php/blog/85-you-did-a-sentiment-analysis-with-tidytext-but-you-forgot-to-do-dependency-parsing-to-answer-why-is-something-positive-negative

[brownag]

this!

[brownag]

I would be open to seeing a pull request that implements NLP for some of the components that are now available in the package datasets.

I can't allocate any work time to this right now, but all of the pieces are there, or otherwise can be made available as products of SoilKnowledgeBase. Anyone interested in taking this on can contact me for pointers.

[dylanbeaudette]

This was more of an open-ended note to myself. Besides issues, are there better places for such notes / ideas?

[brownag]

I have enabled discussions for this repo a while back (https://github.com/ncss-tech/SoilTaxonomy/discussions). These were not available in 2019.

I think it is a fine "issue" if it contains something "actionable" that can be resolved. Discussions are more appropriate for open-ended things. Notes to yourself... possibly could be kept to yourself? I am not saying there is anything wrong with what is here, but I don't think we need to leave open-ended issues open for years.

[dylanbeaudette]

I'll move all issues that are more open-ended ideas over to the discussions and then close.