Closed ncx-gitbot closed 1 year ago
NCX response: Performance in the case of a harvest deferral is no harvest. Non-harvest is measured using change detection remote sensing. In addition, our credits do take into account the growth that happens over a year based on industry-used and accepted timber growth rates. Final performance for individual properties, and at the project scale, is determined by comparing the stocking expected under the baseline and project scenarios, including growth anticipated under each scenario.
Commenter Organization: Forest Carbon Works
Commenter: Briana Capra
2021 Deferred Harvest Methodology Section: Justification for the performance method cites “growth and yield modeling that is necessary in most IFM project types is not employed” (page 6) which is in direct conflict with the definition of Gti (page 27)
Comment: A model to predict growth (Gti) is allowed which negates the justification for a performancebased approach to assessing additionality, that it is a “performance-based methodology that relies on measurements to demonstrate harvest deferrals” which is not accurate.
Proposed Change: No Proposed Change