Comment: This response covers Carbon Market Watch’s (CMW) main comments on the methodology. It does not provide detailed advice on specific elements of the methodology, as we believe that the proposed document is deeply flawed and that the proposed logic is unfit for the generation of carbon credits. This methodology does not meet the basic VCS Quality Assurance Principles1 and should therefore be rejected.
Commenter Organization: Carbon Market Watch
Commenter: Gilles Dufrasne
2021 Deferred Harvest Methodology Section: No Section Indicated
Comment: This response covers Carbon Market Watch’s (CMW) main comments on the methodology. It does not provide detailed advice on specific elements of the methodology, as we believe that the proposed document is deeply flawed and that the proposed logic is unfit for the generation of carbon credits. This methodology does not meet the basic VCS Quality Assurance Principles1 and should therefore be rejected.
Proposed Change: No Proposed Change