ncx-gitbot
commented
1 year ago NCX response: We appreciate comments noting that the structure and performance of the baseline model used within this methodology is strongly influential on the predicted and realized climate impact of projects. Our revised methodology increases transparency rather than following an expert review process. This includes both detailed documentation of particular models used, as well as sharing benchmarking and performance information for baseline models. Finally, the revised approach to uncertainty explicitly accounts for imprecision in the baseline model in calculating the final number of credits generated from projects developed under this methodology.
Commenter Organization: Wagner Forest Management, Ltd.
Commenter: Daniel H. Hudnut
2021 Deferred Harvest Methodology Section: No Section Indicated
Comment: Any methodology that aggregates predicted harvest levels should publish 'wall-to-wall' aggregations against FIA removal data or other published timber harvest data (e.g., State of Maine) to demonstrate that the model is well calibrated to the project area.
Proposed Change: No Proposed Change