search

ndjson / ndjson-spec

Specification
680 stars 29 forks source link

Release 1.0 #13

Closed hoegertn closed 10 years ago

hoegertn commented 10 years ago

I created a tag https://github.com/ndjson/ndjson-spec/tree/vote1.0

Please vote if we shall release the actual version as 1.0

finnp commented 10 years ago

Just to link this, the vote is about the draft 2. I think it would be good, if everyone voting here, reads the draft carefully 1-3 times. (Also because @hoegertn and I are not native speakers)

chrisdew commented 10 years ago

I've read draft 2 through twice and cannot see any glaring errors. (I'm a native English speaker, but not a proof-reader.)

benleb commented 10 years ago

read it twice too, no mistakes found... but im not a native speaker...

hoegertn commented 10 years ago

see #14 The rest looks good.

hoegertn commented 10 years ago

So we are done? I think we can rename the draft2 to Release 1.0 and change the headline. After this we should tag the repo with v1.0.

finnp commented 10 years ago

I merged the proof-reading of #14. If there is no other feedback, I would suggest publishing 1.0 next Tuesday. I think that's enough time for people to have a final look on it.

finnp commented 10 years ago

@hoegertn Apparantly we commented at the same time, didn't see your post. I think releasing it now would be okay, too. Then if there happens to be more feedback/errata we can include that in v1.1.

hoegertn commented 10 years ago

So lets say Sunday 20:00 CEST. I hope we don't need v1.1 very soon.

chrisdew commented 10 years ago

It would be v1.0.1 if it's just typos ;-) http://semver.org/

paulfitz commented 10 years ago

When this gets tagged would it be ok if I added the spec on dataprotocols.org? It would look something like this.

hoegertn commented 10 years ago

This would be great

finnp commented 10 years ago

@paulfitz Yes, awesome, thanks. Would love to see it there.

paulfitz commented 10 years ago

Great, thanks @hoegertn, @finnp. I made a pull request (#15) that would make my life super easy, but it is totally optional.

finnp commented 10 years ago

Okay everyone I created a PR with the version 1.0 :) You can give your final input about how I did it and then maybe someone can just merge it. :tada: