Release Version 1.0

[hoegertn]

What about releasing version 1.0?

\cc @chrisdew

[chrisdew]

I'm a bit busy this month, but I'll get a version 1.0 out with '\n' and without pretty print support in September.

[hoegertn]

Ok, I will try to draft an RFC out of the current spec draft. I will also try to integrate LD-JSON support directly into Apache CXF.

[hoegertn]

@chrisdew Anything new on releasing Version1 of the spec?

[chrisdew]

Sorry, I've been diverted from Javascript development for the time being. I expect to be back on it in a few week.

Apologies,

Chris.

On 5 February 2014 05:17, Thorsten Hoeger notifications@github.com wrote:

@chrisdew https://github.com/chrisdew Anything new on releasing Version1 of the spec?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ldjson/ldjson-spec/issues/2#issuecomment-34138518 .

[hoegertn]

Are there any objections to finalize the current draft 2 of NDJSON? What are the next steps to take? I will create a pull request for Apache CXF to include NDJSON streaming.

[chrisdew]

I've just found a repo implementing NDJSON. I've raised a question: https://github.com/maxogden/ndjson/issues/6

[finnp]

I just did another PR #12 with some simplifications. I would remove the trivial implementation, because I think this shouldn't be that detailed in the spec. Before the spec was more tied to event-based streaming protocols. However I think there is a wider use case for the format (such as storing tabular data), so that the trivial implementation is not needed in such detail.

I think we do have a good minimal specification now. Should we do a video conference for the v.1.0 or do you think we can just review it and then put up the first version here?

[hoegertn]

I like the plan to release 1.0. I think after merging the PR #12 we should open a new issue where every team member votes for the release of a given commit.

[chrisdew]

+1 for PR#12

[hoegertn]

see #13